Private market investments are offered through different fund structures, each with its own approach to deploying capital, generating returns, and reporting performance. Two of the most common structures are evergreen funds and drawdown funds. While both seek to create long-term value, the way performance is measured and communicated differs meaningfully between them.
Understanding these differences can help investors interpret reported results more clearly and set appropriate expectations for how value is created and realized over time.
Evergreen funds are open-ended, meaning they do not have a fixed end date and are designed to provide ongoing access to private market strategies. Capital is invested continuously over time rather than during a single fundraising period. These funds may offer periodic opportunities for investors to add capital or request redemptions, subject to fund terms, liquidity provisions, and potential limitations. This structure is intended to provide investors with greater flexibility and a more consistent investment experience while maintaining long-term exposure to private markets.
Because of this structure, evergreen performance is most clearly understood through total return. Total return captures the full economic experience of an investment over a given period. For evergreen funds, total return has two straightforward components:
The fund's reported net asset value represents the current valuation of the portfolio and appears in each periodic performance report. NAV movement (or appreciation) reflects the change in the fund’s NAV over the period, capturing portfolio performance after expenses.
Cash paid out from the fund during the period.
Total return represents change in NAV + distributions. This framing is intentionally intuitive because it mirrors how value is created and delivered in an evergreen structure: some value remains invested and reflected in NAV, while some value is realized and returned as cash.
Consider an evergreen fund that reports performance on a percentage basis over a period of time. During the period, portfolio investments generated a 6% increase in NAV after expenses, while the fund distributed 4% back to investors.
Together, these components represent a 10% total return for the year. If an investor takes the 4% as cash, their ending value equals the 6% NAV gain plus the 4% cash distribution. If the fund offers the option for investors to reinvest distributions under a Distribution Reinvestment Plan (DRP), the distribution is used to purchase additional shares at the NAV after distribution and the combined share count and NAV produce the same 10% total return; only the form of value holding changes, not the economic return.
This illustrative visual shows how total return for an evergreen fund can be visualized by separating NAV appreciation and distributions into clear components:
For illustrative purposes only. Not a representation of any specific fund.
This approach allows performance to be understood without needing to account for capital calls, reinvestment timing, or complex cash flow schedules. It answers a simple question: How much value was created during the period, based on the fund’s reported valuations, and how was that value delivered?
In practice, performance reports do not always present NAV appreciation and distributions as distinct, side-by-side figures. Instead, investors typically infer NAV movement by comparing beginning and ending net asset value, reviewing period return figures, and referencing separate distribution tables. This requires bringing together multiple data points to understand how total return was generated and how value was delivered over the period.
Drawdown funds follow a different lifecycle. Capital is committed upfront, drawn down over time, and returned through distributions as investments are held and ultimately realized. Because cash flows occur at different points over the life of the fund, performance measurement must account for both timing and magnitude.
As a result, drawdown performance is typically communicated using internal rate of return (IRR) and multiples. IRR measures the annualized rate of return that equates all cash outflows (capital invested) and inflows (distributions and remaining value) over time. IRR is commonly reported on both a gross and net basis, reflecting performance before and after the impact of fees and expenses.
Gross IRR reflects performance at the investment or portfolio level before fees and expenses.
Net IRR reflects performance after management fees and carried interest and represents the return experienced by investors.
Net IRR is the most commonly referenced headline metric for drawdown funds because it incorporates both investment outcomes and the economic structure of the fund.
While IRR captures the effect of timing, investment multiples focus on magnitude, or how much value has been created relative to the amount of capital invested. Multiples answer a straightforward question: How many dollars of value were generated for every dollar invested?
Multiple on Invested Capital, or MOIC, is a common measure of total value created relative to capital invested. It shows how many dollars of value are generated for each dollar invested and can be calculated on either a gross or net basis.
Gross MOIC measures total value created before fees, expenses, and carried interest. It compares the gross value of the investment to total capital invested and is typically used to assess the performance of the underlying assets at the deal or portfolio level, before the impact of fund level economics.
Net MOIC measures total value delivered to investors after fees, expenses, and carried interest. It reflects the investor experience by showing how much value limited partners receive for every dollar they commit to the fund. For example, a net MOIC of 1.8x means that for every $1.00 invested, $1.80 of value has been returned or remains in the investment. While this multiple shows the total amount of value created, it does not indicate how long it took to achieve that result, which is why MOIC is typically evaluated alongside IRR.
Total Value to Paid-In (TVPI) is another way of expressing MOIC and helps explain how total value is split between realized and unrealized components:
• Distributions to Paid-In (DPI), which shows how much cash has been returned to investors relative to the dollars invested
• Residual Value to Paid-In (RVPI), which represents the remaining unrealized value of the investment relative to the dollars invested
Together, these components explain how much value has already been realized in cash and how much value remains invested.
IRR and multiples are best interpreted together. A high IRR combined with a lower multiple may indicate early realizations, while a higher multiple paired with a lower IRR may reflect value that takes longer to realize. Viewed together, these metrics provide a more complete picture of both the efficiency and the scale of value creation in a drawdown investment structure.
Evergreen and drawdown funds share a common goal of long-term value creation in private markets, but differences in fund structure shape how performance is measured, reported, and understood.
Evergreen performance is commonly measured through total return, combining NAV movement and distributions.
Drawdown performance is commonly measured through net IRR and multiples, which account for the timing and scale of cash flows over the life of the fund.
By anchoring performance interpretation to fund structure, reported metrics become easier to read, compare, and contextualize. This clarity helps translate private market results into a more intuitive understanding of how value is created and delivered over time.
Your go-to for an owl’s-eye view on what matters most to us in Private Wealth.
Endnotes
Important information
Unless otherwise noted the Report Date referenced herein is as of March 2026.
Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.
Assets Under Management (“AUM”) refers to the assets that we manage, and is generally equal to the sum of (i) net asset value (“NAV”); (ii) drawn and undrawn debt; (iii) uncalled capital commitments; (iv) total managed assets for certain Credit and Real Assets products; and (v) par value of collateral for collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) and other securitizations.
The material presented is proprietary information regarding Blue Owl Capital Inc. (“Blue Owl”), its affiliates and investment program, funds sponsored by Blue Owl, including the Blue Owl Credit, Real Assets, and GP Strategic Capital Funds (collectively the “Blue Owl Funds”) as well as investment held by the Blue Owl Funds.
The views expressed and, except as otherwise indicated, the information provided are as of the report date and are subject to change, update, revision, verification, and amendment, materially or otherwise, without notice, as market or other conditions change. Since these conditions can change frequently, there can be no assurance that the trends described herein will continue or that any forecasts are accurate. In addition, certain of the statements contained in this material may be statements of future expectations and other forward-looking statements that are based on the current views and assumptions of Blue Owl and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties (including those discussed below) that could cause actual results, performance, or events to differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. These statements may be forward-looking by reason of context or identified by words such as “may, will, should, expects, plans, intends, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, potential or continue” and other similar expressions. Neither Blue Owl, its affiliates, nor any of Blue Owl’s or its affiliates' respective advisers, members, directors, officers, partners, agents, representatives or employees or any other person (collectively the “Blue Owl Entities”) is under any obligation to update or keep current the information contained in this document.
This material contains information from third party sources which Blue Owl has not verified. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is given by or on behalf of the Blue Owl Entities as to the accuracy, fairness, correctness or completeness of the information or opinions contained in this material and no liability whatsoever (in negligence or otherwise) is accepted by the Blue Owl Entities for any loss howsoever arising, directly or indirectly, from any use of this material or its contents, or otherwise arising in connection therewith.
All investments are subject to risk, including the loss of the principal amount invested. These risks may include limited operating history, uncertain distributions, inconsistent valuation of the portfolio, changing interest rates, leveraging of assets, reliance on the investment advisor, potential conflicts of interest, payment of substantial fees to the investment advisor and the dealer manager, potential illiquidity, and liquidation at more or less than the original amount invested. Diversification will not guarantee profitability or protection against loss. Performance may be volatile, and the NAV may fluctuate.
Performance information
Where performance returns have been included in this material, Blue Owl has included herein important information relating to the calculation of these returns as well as other pertinent performance related definitions.
This material is for informational purposes only and is not an offer or a solicitation to sell or subscribe for any fund and does not constitute investment, legal, regulatory, business, tax, financial, accounting, or other advice or a recommendation regarding any securities of Blue Owl, of any fund or vehicle managed by Blue Owl, or of any other issuer of securities. Only a definitive offering document (i.e.: Prospectus or Private Placement Memorandum) can make such an offer.